Imaginos wrote on Dec 16
th, 2009 at 3:08pm:
I'm assuming Rick is using the "group assigns ability scores for each other" to represent themselves in real life. Unless they aren't being honest or nice to each other, how many gamers do you expect to be putting near the top of the average person? I would expect a group to give each other above average intelligence, but the physical stats get a bit tougher.
Heck, I'd give myself a 10-11 Str, 8-9 End (tend to get sick), back in college an 11-12 agility, but now probably 10. And that is just me being realistic and realizing what the years have done to me, especially the last 15 as an office worker. Pop in a 14 Int, and you don't have much to build on.
Yeah, add in the fact that many gamer types (at least many in my group) tend to fit the stereotype of a gamer physique (meaning they have 6 or more Basic Hits); to honestly figure out their CC would mean that their Strength and Endurance scores would be pretty low as well. And most would probably have a below average Agility as well. Some in my group would fit the gamer stereotype in having a pretty low Charisma as well.
I agree that the average Intelligence would be on the high end, though.
I like some of the things Rick pointed out as far as playing oneself (especially if it takes place in a dystopian, alternate world), but figure that "playing oneself" is probably best for players in their 20's or early 30's. It's not quite as desireable for kids (as Hammer and I have kids that play now) or older folks (like many of us are becoming).